Elder Alert

Homepage -- Programs and Services -- Contact Information

Letter sent to Berkshire County Legislative Team, dated June 5, 2003

I have enclosed a column I wrote for the June issue of Berkshire Senior (circulation 10,000). It is entitled "Elders well served by Berkshire County legislative team". Thank you for all that you do for the elders of Berkshire County.

At this critical time, Elder Services asks that you continue to advocate for and safeguard the interests of elders, and that you support the following:

1. Support Senate Outside Section 70, which clearly outlines the roles and responsibilities of a strong Executive Office of Elder Affairs (EOEA) and the Aging Services Access Points (ASAPs). Under Section 70, Elder Affairs finally becomes the single entry point for a coordinated one-stop shopping approach to elder services by combining a wide range of programs - from nursing home to home care - under a single, consolidated Elder Affairs office. Section 70 maintains a key role for the ASAPs in pre-screening for institutional and community based long term care. Section 70 makes sense for elder consumers and is the culmination of a two decade effort to create a gateway to services for elders. The Senate Plan maintains a strong Elder Affairs and ASAP system that will best serve the elders of Berkshire County and this Commonwealth for today and tomorrow. We also urge you to delete House Outside Sections 36 and 435, which conflict with the Senate single entry point plan.

2. Support the move of Senate Line Item 0400-0600, the Medicaid "senior plan", into Elder Affairs. If we are going to end our over-reliance on institutional care as a first resort, this is an important first step. This plan will save the state money because it costs far less to provide service in someone’s home than it does to pay for someone to live in a nursing home. This plan also better implements the U.S. Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision, which says that a disabled person (which is the criteria for anyone living in a nursing home) has the right to receive care in the most integrated setting appropriate to his/her needs - the community, if he or she so chooses.

3. Support Full Restoration of the Prescription Advantage Plan. (Senate Line Item 9110-1455).

4. Support Level funding for the Councils on Aging. (Senate Line Item 9110-9002).

5. Support level funding for Home Care Services, and for Case Management and ASAP operations. (House Line Items 9110-1630 and 9110-1633, respectively.

6. Support Senate Line Item 9110-1500, which keeps the Enhanced Programs under EOEA, and Senate Line Item 9110-1636, which provides level funding for Protective Services.

I have also enclosed for your review a list of the Mass Home Care Association’s priorities entitled "Mass Home Care Requests: Conference FY 2004 Budget".

As always, thank you for your ongoing support of elder needs and services.

Sincerely,

Robert P. Dean
Executive Director

Below are attachments #1 and #2

Mass Home Care Requests:
Conference Committee FY 2004 Budget

4000-0600**

Medicaid "senior care plans"

Senate

Senate reorg places this line item within EOEA accounts & earmarks $9.2 M for "Community Choices" plan. Also allows "care management" as an eligible Choices service.

9110-0100

EOEA, Office of the Secretary

Senate

Provides $1.8 M, which will be needed for EOEA to assume greater role in coordination of LTC services.

9110-1455

Prescription Advantage

Senate

Provides $96.3 M for drug program & puts it under EOEA, not DMA.

9110-1500**

Enhanced Programs

Senate

Senate keeps this item under EOEA. Does not belong under DMA: includes many non-Medicaid clients.

9110-1604

Supportive Senior Housing

House

House level funds this item to FY 2003, Senate cuts it by $85,000.

9110-1630**

Home care services

House

House provides level funding at FY 2003 level of $94.158 M; Senate is $93.76 M, $398,000 lower.

9110-1633**

Care Management & ASAP operations

House

House provides level funding at FY 2003 levels at $36.044 M; Senate cuts by $1.1 million to $34.94 M.

9110-1636**

Protective Services

Senate

Senate level funds at FY 2003 level of $10.045 M; House cuts by $441,000. Both versions keep Money Management, but Senate funds it.

9110-1660

Congregate Housing

House

House level funds item at FY 2003 levels, Senate cuts by $150,404.

9110-1900

Local Services: Elder Service

Corps & Elder Lunch

House

House funds at $4.11 M, or $157,717 higher than Senate. Senate drops

 


 

 

 

 

Elder Service Corps. Both versions cut current $4.45 M level in FY 2003.

9110-9002

Councils on Aging

Senate

Senate level funds at $5.9 M to FY 2003 level; House cuts by $536,000.

 


 

_House Outside Sections

 

 

 

Outside Section 13*

EOHHS powers & duties

Do not support

Support Senate Outside Section 17 instead.

Outside Section 36*

ASAP roles &

responsibilities

Do not support

Support Senate Outside Section 70 instead.

Outside Section 435*

Transfers 2176 waiver to DMA

Do not support

Senate leaves waiver in OEA, but in Outside Section 17 gives EOHHS power to operate and administer Medicaid programs through the Office of Elder Affairs.

Senate Outside Sections

 

 

 

Outside Section 17

EOHHS powers

Support

Provides for an Office of Elder Affairs with a Secretary of the DEA. EOHHS secretary serves as administrative head of DEA.

Outside Section 70**

ASAP law

Support

DEA manages the home care program, and case management for Medicaid community based care; ASAPs  to coordinate community services for Medicaid recipients, do pre-admission screening for institutional and community-based care; DEA responsible for overall management, admin and oversight related to screening and authorization of community LTC services.

Outside Section 323

EOHHS Single State Agency

Support

EOHHS Secretary is responsible for Medicaid programs, and acts through Sec. Of Elder Affairs as appropriate.

Outside Section 326

DEA powers

Support

Gives DEA power, within Ch. 118E , to make contracts, enter into agreements, etc. like DMA can.

Outside Section 598

EOHHS Study on Reorg

Support, but...

Calls for EOHHS to study the

 

 

 

 

desirability and feasibility of using ASAPs to screen disabled people seeking NH care. This is already being done (see Senate Outside Section 70), so section (a) of this section could be deleted.

 

Key: An * asterisk = priorities. **= top priorities.

 

Elders well served by Berkshire County legislative team

Much has been said and written during the past few months about the coming fiscal year, which will begin July 1, 2003, and whether the services upon which elders depend in order to remain where they want to be - in their own homes within their own communities - will continue to be available to them.

There has been much to be concerned about, particularly in regards to the Governor’s proposals to eliminate the Prescription Advantage Plan, to drastically reduce funding to the Councils on Aging, and to re-organize and downsize the Executive Office of Elder Affairs.

There has been a significant amount of advocacy to restore the Prescription Advantage Plan so that elders are not forced to choose between buying food or their prescription medications because they can’t afford to pay for both; to provide appropriate funding to the Councils on Aging so that they can continue to serve their communities and provide a vital every day link - and lifeline - between elders and those communities; and, to retain a strong Executive Office of Elder Affairs that controls its own budget and programs so that it is able to ensure that the elder voice will be heard and that elders will continue to receive the community and in-home services they need.

During this difficult time, the elders of Berkshire County have been well served by their elected representatives in both the House and the Senate. Over the past few months, Senator Andrea F. Nuciforo, Jr., and Representatives Daniel E. Bosley, Shaun P. Kelly, Peter P. Larkin, and William "Smitty" Pignatelli have heard elder concerns and have responded to them. They have shown a sincere interest in and knowledge of elder issues. We are fortunate to have such a committed and dedicated legislative team representing Berkshire County.

As the House and Senate begin to conference on the final budget they will present to the Governor, it appears that the Prescription Advantage Plan, which was eliminated by the Governor, will be restored and will be affordable to new enrollees; that much of the Council on Aging funding eliminated by the Governor will be restored; and that Elder Affairs may finally become the "gateway" for a coordinated one-stop service approach, which will combine a wide range of programs - from nursing home to home care - under the control of a single, consolidated Elder Affairs office.

On behalf of Elder Services, I would like to thank Senator Nuciforo, and Representatives Bosley, Kelly, Larkin, and Pignatelli for their support of elder needs and services, and to ask for their continued support in the days ahead.